Dune Buggy Cage Proiect

survey started!

To the next topics to be able to, I would like to participate you again !
to your right, are the topics! You may like to click more if it should interest you!
I run the first survey to 30.05.2010 !
I would be happy but also, if you have topic suggestions , the closer you are interested!
write me an e-mail or a comment under the post!

Regards Micha

Free Word Invitation Templates Fashion Show

Own image critique in hindsight to be!

Inspired by a video of Martin Krolop http://www.krolop-gerst.com/blog/
times today I would like to address the issue image critique in hindsight !

something straight away. Until recently, I've done in the studio or via histogram of the exposure of my pictures! This is tedious, time consuming and not really purposeful, because I had read the available light is always subjective in the bar chart!

That changes now, because I put a reasonable meter risen have! I would refrain no longer, I shall add, even without a model can now objectively see the amount of lights!

My advice:

"Those who work in the studio comes, sooner or later, not around a light meter!"

Now to the actual topic!
Now it is probably every way you make when looking at the pictures after the fact at once errors are discovered that you should not have, or would at least have a notice as a photographer!
So also with me ...
can now say again but one that can save Photoshop certain things. In my view, It may not have been intended that I edit in retrospect must disappear for ever let my blunder to shoot at! So overall I
times today published a picture from a series and will look to show times and error, and what I really like!

Here is an example image:

The image is "out of Cam and was received with 5 flashes!
a main light in the form of a Octabox behind me! 2 Highlights , in the form of 2 Strip Lights angle behind the model. 1 hair light , which has a small Octabox was on the model! And the last lightning was a standard reflector with a grid (honeycomb) for the background! The

as benchmarks for the subsequent more detailed examination of the picture!

Let's start with the negative points!

like What I do:

1. The illumination of the background ! Wanted a spotartigere illumination was behind the model. I should have used so better tube as attachment for the flash!
2. I would take the Octabox, rather them take a Dish , the Plastität of the models, and the clothes would have better brought to bear. (Of course obliquely from above) This would, however, a course on the model magic. I think in this case would be a 6ter flash with Dish as the main light and fill light Octabox been a better solution. I have not seen, so I have to live with it.
3. The case of the dress below ! Due to the wide case, and the relatively narrow image section occurs before the viewer as if the model is still relatively strong hips, which in reality was not so!
4. The small finger of your left hand, spread apart!
5. The folds on chest, could have been put better! But I did not just get seen!

But all is still the same bad!


What I liked:

1. The closely linked hair leave, effect lights come into their well and separate the best model from the background.
2. The staring into the camera speaks directly to the viewer, I find precisely such glances at the camera extremely fascinating, because I immediately addressed as a viewer feel
3. The intensive, yet distanced view of the model, fits well with the Farbichkeit of the image together, which is underlined by gray and blue tones a cool atmosphere
4. The nose and chin shadows my opinion fall and sit perfectly nice central location. Solely had the the Lichtcharacteristik can be stronger bothers me here!
5. What I do not like about the the arms . Thus I find the film editor and I support the best use of the grazielen body of my models!
6. What else I find good, close the section above and below, where you should consider it just the outfit.

All in all I like the image very well! Nevertheless, I must confess that I had 2-3 more Patzer to notice!
is the nunmal ... But you have his pictures just sometimes can take down!

I hope this post could you take something for you and your works sometimes viewed from a different light!
Mir hats again at least helped, particularly with regard constructive criticism, as only a "malign" brings an image to that little. You better tell him also what you had done differently and why!

In the sense
Happy
Micha

Filme Incestos Itlianos

New portfolio images

Today a relatively short blog!
It's about the recently announced shooting from the blog: Are http://germangothicarts.blogspot.com/2010/04/fotoshooting.html
A few impressions have been included in my portfolio! So feel free to go visit!

image Review:
In not too distant future, I will be here by talking with you even a picture of AZ ! This sometimes with its own criticism to you error on my part to get even close!
What I mean by criticism of their own pictures, I'll explain in a separate post, but because I have this very controversial subject, very exciting find and I like your opinion to have!

Until then, Happy
Micha

Acronis,installer Interuppted,true Image Server

Less is sometimes more!

Today for some time once again explain how the accompanying picture was taken and processed was!

As its title of the post suggests, it is this is a recording with relatively few resources . And so it was! Was used a single light source !
Oh the picture that I am curious ...? Why not a model! Well one just has not always been a spontaneous model available, or has time. Of course it would have been a better solution, because as a model, I do not own me so real!
But that was not right! Primarily focused on the education and training of my assistant, not the excellent photo's. Technical refinement and error analysis were at the forefront!

This has arisen as far as the background, to what extent the picture!

camera settings: ISO 100, 1/125sec, f 8.0

The case is set main light was based on the desired effect we record! We wanted both a relatively hard, but not too hard illumination! Therefore came to us the Dish than light formers in question! That we are slightly above added by me as a model to a drop shadow to generate the image and thus give the image depth!

The strength of the flash, we have a working aperture of 8.0 f are measured as the background in the image should be sharp!

Who looked closely, which recognizes no reflections on the glasses of the flash can be seen. But how is this possible ...
This is relatively easy ... Flash installed simply click!

For something harder, or even spotartigere illumination lighting, I recommend using a comb on Dish, or maybe even a tube ! The honeycomb directs the light, but creates a even greater brightness gradient on the model. That was with us but not necessary, because the flash was relatively close to the model and this went so came about anyway!

At the end, the processed image :

The light falloff was further elaborated by means of Photoshop to the viewer's attention even more strongly in the direction of the face. Through the Black and White conversion was dramatized by the image of my thoughts on and captivates the viewer!

Kind regards Micha